Advertise on the world's largest semiconductor IP catalog at ChipEstimate.com Advertise on the world's largest semiconductor IP catalog at ChipEstimate.com
Advertise on the world's largest semiconductor IP catalog at ChipEstimate.com
RSS
IP Insider - Semiconductor IP news and trends blog with John Blyler

IP Insider
Semiconductor IP News and Trends Blog

By John Blyler

Mixed-Signal and RF Help Drive Silicon-on-Insulator Growth

Here’s another example of the growing importance of analog/mixed-signal, RF-wireless, and silicon-on-insulator technologies.

Several recent announcements confirm the convergence of analog/mixed-signal circuits and silicon-on-insulator (SOI) -based technology. First, Altis announced its foundry partnership deal with IBM’s 180-nm SOI technology. This agreement allows the processor giant to leverage Altis’ analog/mixed-signal and RF expertise. Secondly, Cadence has agreed to acquire Cosmic Circuits, a major mixed-signal IP company (see “Raising The Stakes For IP”).

Adele HARS at Advanced Substrate News (ASN) has reported that over 50% of smartphones and tablets contain SOI technology – used both in processors and new-generation RF chips. “Soitec says it’s shipped over 200,000 engineered wafers to customers making chips for mobile communication this fiscal year. Those wafers translate into about 2.5 billion ICs for RF front-end module apps, which covers half of the 600 million smartphones and 100 million tablets expected to be produced this year,” noted HARS.

In the SOI process, a thin layer of silicon is deposited onto an insulating substrate at high temperature. When compared to bulk CMOS, the insulating substrate provides much lower parasitic capacitance. Such low capacitance, in turn, improves the speed and linearity of the circuit at lower power.

One of the first silicon-on-insulator semiconductor manufacturing technologies used in the RF space was silicon-on-sapphire (SOS; see “Noble Award Honors Low-Power RF Technology”).

For IP designers, the implementation material – be it bulk CMOS or SOI – has only minor impact on the design. In terms of manufacturability, however, SOI helps to extend the value of geometrics that are not on the “leading edge.” This is good news for an industry that may be hitting the wall in terms of the cost benefits of digital scaling.

Posted in General | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Moore’s Cycle, Fifth Horseman, Mixed Signals, and IP Stress

What do all of these things have in common? They were key topics addressed by Cadence, Samsung, and others at CDNLive 2013.

What does Cadence see as future trends and challenges facing the semiconductor, EDA, and IP industries? To answer this question, I attended CDNLive2013, the company’s event for users, developers, and customers. Here are the highlights from that trip:

1. System to Silicon Verification – How It All Fits Together by Frank Schirrmeister, Group Director for Product Marketing of the System Development Suite at Cadence and blogger on the System Level Design community:

By 2015, the majority of system-on-a-chip (SoC) designs will be implemented at geometries below 90 nm. There will be fewer design starts, but each will have over 110 IP blocks with more than 70% reuse. Software will continue to dominate design activity, taking over 60% of the work effort. Software will be distributed over the entire SoC. Low power will remain a driving design constraint. SoCs will contain an ever-increasing amount of analog/mixed-signal (AMS) circuitry.

Schirrmeister discussed the challenges of sensor networks used to monitor the health of cows (bovine) in the field as but one example of the variety of mixed-signal applications. This particular design was based on the ARM Cortex MO microcontroller.

Schirrmeister noted that EDA companies have had to expand their coverage into the larger system market, thanks to changes in the semiconductor supply chain. Around 2000, the industry was very fragmented (i.e., mobile chip and IP vendors worked with handset makers, who then partnered with operating-system suppliers and finally network operators). The next 12 years resulted in various combinations of subsystem integration – the result being that EDA and IP companies like Cadence must provide software (drivers and firmware for now) to their customers. In other words, the definition of the EDA-IP “system” continues to evolve.

2. Interview about mixed-signal technology trends with Mladen Nizic, Engineering Director for Mixed Signal Solutions, and Dave DeMaria, Ecosystem Alliances, Worldwide Field Operations:

Cadence’s Mladen Nizic (background right) and Dave DeMaria (background left) talk about mixed-signal technology with John Blyler, editor of Chip Design magazine. (Photo courtesy of Lani Wong)

The growth of the mobile market – including wireless, networking, storage, and computing – requires integrated analog/mixed-signal (AMS) and/or RF functionality combined with the digital circuit. One example of this combination is a digitally assisted, mixed-signal device (e.g., a VCO with digital calibration).

Verification of the growing analog/mixed-signal portion of SoCs is leading to better behavioral models, which abstract the analog upward to the register transfer level (RTL). This improvement provides a more consistent handoff between the analog and digital boundaries. Another improvement is the use of real number models (RNMs), which enable the discrete time transformations needed for pure digital solver simulation of analog/mixed-signal verification. This approach enables faster simulation speeds for event-driven real-time models – a benefit over behavioral models like Verilog-A.

AMS simulations are also using assertion techniques to improve verification – especially in interface testing.

One important trend is the use of statistical analysis to handle both the analog nature of mixed signals and the increasing number of operational modes. I’ll post my detailed interview with Nizic and DeMaria in an upcoming blog.

3. Keynote presentations

Lip-Bu Tan, president and CEO of Cadence, began his keynote by showcasing many of today’s most popular consumer electronics – from Google glasses and other wearable embedded electronics to Samsung gesture recognition TVs and the latest automotive infotainment systems. All of these products were made possible by the semiconductor industry.

Lip-Bu Tan, president and CEO of Cadence, addresses a full audience at the company’s CDNLive2013 event.

The consumer-electronics industry has grown, thanks to the popularity of mobile and social-media applications. These applications represent important aspects of the Internet of Things – all of those unique objects that make up the front and back end of the Internet. With over one billion users on Facebook, Tan noted that the back-end cloud computing and big-data aspects of the Internet are as critical as the front-end devices. “The semiconductor industry figures prominently in all of this,” he summarized.

Chip designers and manufacturers have had to overcome significant challenges to bring these amazing devices and infrastructure to market. But even more difficult challenges lie ahead. Tan listed several of the more critical ones – from lithography and design-rule complexity to IP integration, the proliferation of mixed-signal circuits needed to support the Internet of Things, and low-power and signal-integrity issues.

Cadences success in overcoming these challenges was due to collaboration with its partners, said Tan. For example, Cadence, ARM, and TSMC continue to collaborate on 20-nm FinFET designs. Stacked-die 3D IC technology represented another area of partnership (in this case, with TSMC’s Chip-on-Wafer-on-Substrate [CoWoS] integration process). As a final example, Tan highlighted Cadence’s 14-nm FinFET collaboration with Samsung.

On the business side of the market, Cadence has acquired several IP-rich companies over the last few years. Two recently named acquisitions – Cosmic Circuits and Tensilica – will enhance the company’s position in the mixed-signal and dataplane processing markets, respectively. (Cadence To Buy Tensilica)

In conclusion, Tan highlighted one consumer success based in part on the use of Cadence’s EDA tools and methodologies – namely, the Hero GoPro camera. Over 2.3 million units were shipped last year. He hoped that such commercial successes would help to ignite interest in the EDA industry, inspiring high-school and college students to view chip design with the same “coolness” factor as the other technology giants (e.g., Facebook and Google).

The next speaker was Samsung Electronic’s CEO, Young Sohn. He provided a customer view of the semiconductor market. Samsung’s goal is to be seen as a part of the global consumer community. One measure of the success of Samsung’s branding campaign was the company’s placement among the top 10 traditional consumer brands, replacing traditional products like software drinks.

Samsung Electronic’s CEO Young Sohn speaks at Cadence’s CDNLive2013.

Today’s post-PC era is dominated by non-Windows operating systems like Apple’s iOS and Google’s Android, said Sohn. This is one indicator of the popularity of mobile devices. Not surprisingly, most of the growth at Samsung has occurred in the mobile and cloud markets. If those market segments were removed, growth in the global semiconductor market would have been flat.

Mobile is big and getting bigger. Sohn said that the company’s vision was to create products that would share data and applications among all devices – from smartphones to smart sensors. To show that mobile is much bigger than just web access, he shared a video clip where wireless nanobots were used to kill cancer cells.

Sohn was cautious about the traditional cost and form-factor reduction enabled by the semiconductor market. “Moore’s Law is an observation. In the future, cycle times (of Moore’s Law) may increase,” he speculated.

What technologies would smartphones utilize seven years from now? A good bet would be fifth-generation (5G) cellular, low-power WiFi-based dust networks with environmental sensing and high-definition, flexible organic LED displays – all running at 13 Wh. Today’s smartphones run on 8 Wh of power or less. Sohn conceded that many innovations will be needed to achieve these features – especially in low-power design and improved energy storage (i.e., battery technology).

Sohn echoed Tan’s litany of challenges facing chip designers and manufacturers – from continued device scaling to double and triple patterning and EUV lithography obstacles for the lowest nodes. He observed that there is always a cost-versus-risk tradeoff with new technologies.

One alternative to leading-edge, lowest-node technology is 3D stacked-die ICs. For now, 3D chip packaging is as expensive as the design of the SoC. But compressing form factors in mobile is important, as with system-in-package (SiP) technologies. Sohn issued the common desire that EDA tools need to do a better job with 3D stacking designs. 3D SoC designs are like housing urbanization, said Sohn. Chips need to be denser, but also must handle the increased traffic load. This is another area where innovation is required to find a solution.

Designing chips of ever-increasing complexity is not an easy task. Neither is making those chips. Manufacturing SoCs at leading-edge foundries has become a very exclusive club. The few winners that have the money and resources to create these fabs will take the biggest share of the revenue. This creates a very high barrier for startup innovation. Sohn recommended that chip designers focus on what they do best. This approach is why the development of outside, non-internal IP is a growth segment. The challenges of manufacturing and design force IP, EDA, and foundries to work together to build successful products.

Innovations are needed to overcome future design and manufacturing issues. This innovation will probably lead to disruptive technologies. To encourage this innovation, the company recently launched the Samsung Strategy and Innovation Center (SSIC), which will invest $1.1B in existing and disruptive technologies. Such an investment will help the company maintain its position as the so-called “fifth horseman” alongside Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google in Silicon Valley. “We need to innovate outside of Korea with Silicon Valley,” Sohn concluded.

Rounding off the keynote presenters was Martin Lund, Senior VP of the SoC Realization Group at Cadence. He explained that, while SoCs were everywhere from smartphones to the cloud, the new thing was the growing application space in which these chips must exist.

Cadence’s Martin Lund (center) talks with editors Ed Sperling (right) and John Blyler (left) about the next generation of IP technology. (Photo courtesy of Lani Wong)

Lund focused on the design of the SoC, but with this twist: The application space for chips is growing to encompass the Internet-of-Things universe – from smartphones and new application devices to the cloud.

A key challenge presented by expanding application spaces was the IP verification of ever-changing standards. “There are hundreds of pages of requirements for just the latest PCIe, Gen. 3 specification,” he noted. “All of these dynamic requirements affect the IP on the SoC.”

The traditional idea of IP reuse was that once IP was created, it could be reused over and over again. Lund said that this idea was being challenged. He used the evolving Ethernet standard as an example, where 45 cumulative additions had occurred since the standard’s origin in 1983. Such constant changes meant that the IP-reuse model was under stress.

To meet this challenge, IP must be designed for change. He explained that IP must be optimized for the application (i.e., from a software perspective). This approach also addresses the fact that software often decides if a design will achieve the critical time-to-market (TTM) window.

IP must be built to fit the SoC. To achieve this end, Lund said that next-generation IP must be optimized for the end application. It also must be part of an intelligent subsystem. Furthermore, IP must be pre-verified. This is why Cadence provides a growing number of design cores and verification IP tools, he concluded.

For more details, read Richard Goering’s blog: Martin Lund CDNLive Keynote: Why SoCs Need “Application Optimized” IP.

 

Related coverage and reference content:

 

John E. Blyler
Author, IP Insider blog
Editor-in-Chief, Chip Design magazine



Free counter and web stats

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Q&A Reveals Deep Semiconductor Trends

Will Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) lithography ever come to pass? When will nanotube technology hit the market? Will the cost of chips continue to go down? These were just a few of the questions covered during the press lunch at the 2013 Common Platform Technology Forum. The panelists included (seated, left to right): Michael Cadigan, General Manager of IBM’s Microelectronics Division; Gary Patton, VP, IBM’s Semiconductor R&D Center; KH Kim, Executive VP for Samsung Electronics’ Foundry Business; and Mike Noonen, Executive VP of Global Sales and Marketing for GLOBALFOUNDRIES. What follow are excerpts of that discussion.

Question: When will nanotube technology hit the market?

Patton: FinFET structures will last a decade, maybe longer. Moving beyond silicon to III-V materials will also help to extend existing designs. (Editor’s note: The III-V compound semiconductors come from combining group III elements (essentially Al, Ga, and In) with group V elements (essentially N, P , As, and Sb) of the periodic table. This results in 12 possible combinations. The most important ones are probably GaAs, InP, GaP, and GaN.)

Question: Will EUV ever come to pass?

Patton: EUV requires real physics changes. At the recent SEMI Industry Strategy Symposium (ISS), someone said that EUV is hard work. No, it is hard physics. The industry is trying to extend immersion and double patterning, but  no one wants to move to quadruple patterning.

Question: What does “hard physics” mean? The scientific effort is 20% while the engineering portion is 80%?

Patton: I’ve never attached a percentage to it. Perhaps it would be 60% science and 40% engineering effort.

Cadigan: We had envisioned the entry point for EUV at the 10-nm-node geometry. Now, that point is 7 nm. If anyone has seen ASML’s EUV tool, they know it’s really tough.

Question: If you don’t have EUV at 7 nm, will you need triple or quad patterning?

Cadigan: Yes, we always have an alternative. For example, fully depleted (FD) silicon-on-insulator (FD-SOI) was ready at about the same time as FinFET technology. If FinFET had been late, FD-SOI was the backup plan.

Question: Costs continue to rise for chip design and manufacturing. Will Moore’s Law end soon?

Noonen: Cost is where the rubber meets the road. Fabs must make money, but need to offer designers the right mix of power, performance, and cost (i.e., they must right-size to the right solutions). This goes beyond one metric, beyond a geometry.

Question: Lowering the cost of chips is a maturation of process. Is that maturation taking more time?

Noonen: We are working on 28-nm to 14-nm geometries all at once, accelerating the process to bring forth multiple nodes. This is breaking the typical two-year duty cycle between nodes from previous years.

Cadigan: I use the phrase time-to-market (TTM) instead of maturation. Our partners want earlier involvement to bring their technology to market at a faster pace. The model is shifting in 2013 – we all must work faster. For us (IBM), that shift means moving more quickly from the Albany facility to Fishkill to our customers to shorten the time for development – and hence TTM.

Science is nice, but cost is critical. We need to drive the cost out of the technology. For example, we are leveraging what we learn in Fishkill – which is not high-volume –  along with Globalfoundries and Samsung to leverage the total cost point.

Question: Will 450-mm wafers be available in the latter part of this decade?

Cadigan: The Global G450 Consortium now has a consensus that 450 mm is happening. But I don’t know the timing of 450 mm. Volume production will probably come at the end of the decade. The challenge is that the timing of 450-mm wafers will depend upon lithography technology – back to the EUV question. But EUV will come to market for both 300 mm and 450 mm (see “CNSE Readying NFX Fab for G450C, EUV Efforts”).

Question: Will the tools at 10 nm reduce the need for triple and quadruple patterning?

Patton: We’ve extended immersion for a long time. Programmable light-source work is ongoing with ASML. Directed self-assembly (DSA) could be used to avoid quadruple (4) patterning.

Question: Broadcom’s CEO is quoted as saying that the benefits for cost on scaling will not continue. Cost benefits of scaling have gone away. Do you agree?

Patton: Comparisons between 20-nm to 14-nm nodes are not good, since those are not full nodes. You need to compare cost scaling between full nodes. In the past, 50% scaling provided 20% cost savings. Those ratios will change.

Question: The original idea of the Common Platform Alliance was to share fabs. Is that still possible?

Cadigan: That was the original idea – release a design into two different fabs using the same kits (PDKs). As we evolved, we realized that only a few companies would do that. Samsung will tune its process slightly off of our common platform base. Or Globalfoundries will have one or two large clients who want a tuning. Our goal is still common-based foundational content. Now, it’s okay to personalize it.  That’s why we are doing more in Albany instead of Fishkill.

Posted in General | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Globalfoundries Shares Uncommon Solutions, New Fab and Node Variations

Globalfoundries’s VP Mike Noonen talks with Chip Design’s John Blyler and Chipestimate.TV’s Sean O’Kane at the Common Platform Technology (CPT) forum.

Highlights of the talk:

  • Noonen recapped Globalfoundries‘s low-power/high-technology balance in the 32-, 28-, 20-, and 14-nm FinFET platforms.
  • Uncommon solutions were highlighted in the world of clocking, multicore, and SOI designs (i.e., Cyclos, Adapteva, ST Micro, and Soitec partnerships).
  • Recently opened New York fab holds six football fields of clean rooms with 60 miles of monorail shuffling wafer tracks. But more impressive is the variety of designs being manufactured – from 32, 28, and 20 nm to 14-nm FinFETs.

Posted in General, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Trends in Subsystem Semiconductor IP

As IP leads semiconductor growth, subsystem blocks cause node-based cost challenges, verification issues, hidden embedded cores, interface preferences, and more.

What’s new in the world of subsystem intellectual property (IP)? To find out, System-Level Design sat down with Richard Wawrzyniak, Senior Market Analyst for ASICs and SoCs at Semico Research Corp. What follow are excerpts of that conversation:

SLD: You mentioned that the cost of semiconductor IP at 20 nm and below is increasing. Why is that?
Wawrzyniak: The reason is complicated. For sure, the cost of hard IP (offered in a GDSII format and optimized for a specific foundry process) at lower nodes will increase due to changes in the actual transistor device—among other things. However, the cost of soft IP wouldn’t necessarily go up because it’s synthesizable (in a high-level language like RTL, C++, Verilog, or VHDL). Thus, the cost of soft IP is not really tied to the process node. Still, if an IP vendor needs to devote more effort to developing IP for a non-regular CMOS process, such as a FinFet device, the cost of even the soft IP might increase.

SLD: Wouldn’t significant changes in the device parameters of the SPICE model cause an increase in the cost of IP?
Wawrzyniak: There are two cost elements people often confuse when talking about IP. One is the license cost of the IP. The other is the cost to integrate that IP into the device - into silicon. What we are talking about is the licensing cost of the IP, not the integration cost. I would suspect integration costs will continue to rise. The only thing that might stabilize or even decrease the integration costs would be moving toward IP subsystems. The designer will then be using larger pieces of IP as opposed to lots of small discrete blocks.

SLD: You’re the expert on IP subsystems. Is it a growing market? What are the latest trends?
Wawrzyniak: More people are using subsystem IP, whether they have created it internally or licensed it from an IP provider like Cadence, Synopsys, or others. Overall, I see a rise in that activity.

SLD: Are verification hooks bundled into the subsystem IP?
Wawrzyniak: That’s where it gets a little hazy. With subsystem IP, designers license a system-level function, such as a communication subsystem. For example, an SoC designer might need several different types of communication protocols - including HDMI, MIPI, etc. - for a consumer device. The designer could get all of the functions as discrete blocks and throw them together, or he/she could license a complete communication IP subsystem from a vendor as one contiguous block. This subsystem IP block could then be tested in parallel with IP that the designers must create in-house. The verification suites also could be run in parallel on all discrete and system IP blocks. Theoretically, the designer could cut down on his/her total verification effort. If you reduce this effort, then theoretically, you reduce the total cost of integration.

Unfortunately, if you give designers more headroom, they often use it all up – plus a little extra. So theoretically, you may not reduce the cost of the effort at all. Instead, it might end up being more expensive. But in exchange for that incremental increase in cost of integration, you end up with a device that has much more functionality. That is a main driver behind the subsystem concept.

SLD: The growth of IP continues to outpace the overall semiconductor-market growth rate. This refers to blocks of discrete IP. If designers are increasing their use of subsystem IP, would you expect the resulting bundling of IP to cause a decrease in the IP growth rate?
Wawrzyniak: That might happen, but farther down the road. We are just beginning to see actual commercial subsystem products and licenses. So that effect, if it happens at all, will not happen for quite some time.

SLD: Sensors are being incorporated into every imaginable device. Are you seeing any growth in the sensor IP market?
Wawrzyniak: The problem is that most sensors are based on a microelectromechanical-systems (MEMS) process. For sensors to be a viable market, where you can license the function, you have to have access to a MEMS process technology. That part of it hasn’t evolved yet. Instead, most designers that use sensors in cell phones and the like buy a MEMS chip that contains all of the sensors. These companies buy the chip from a vendor that has access to the MEMS process and puts all of the sensors into silicon. That’s not the same thing as today’s traditional IP market. I don’t think we are quite at the point where you can actually go out and license sensor IP as IP that can be included in an SoC design—but the time is coming.

SLD: From your research, what are the major IP growth categories?
Wawrzyniak: I break the IP market into 10 buckets or categories: memory, CPU, DSP, graphics, analog, interface, logic, chip enhancement, interconnect, and security. Each of these IP categories is further broken into licensing, royalty, and service revenues. Since people haven’t yet reported for Q4 2012, these numbers are just a forecast for on-chip IP revenues:

> CPU: $1B
> Interface: $600M
> Memory: $400M
> Other: $1.4B
> Total IP market = $3.4B in 2012

An interesting footnote concerning on-chip interface IP is the ongoing and increasing importance of Serializer/Deserializer (SerDes) communication channels. Designers are moving away from parallel connectivity and toward the higher performance of SerDes channels. Most people think of SerDes as a real heavy-lifting analog mixed-signal (AMS) technology, which it is. But SerDes also has a digital side, which has a MAC and a PHY. Most designers would not contemplate licensing the SerDes PHY from one vendor and the MAC from another. They are optimized to work together. That’s why I include SerDes in the interface and not the analog category.

SLD: Are the number of cores continuing to increase in mobile devices?
Wawrzyniak: There is a growing dichotomy between cores that are embedded in devices and cores that are programmable by the user. For example, a smartphone might have a number of well-known cores from ARM, Qualcomm, etc. But behind those publicly stated cores are many other embedded cores. The user is unaware of them because they cannot get to them—cores from Tensilica, CEVA, Imagination Technologies, and so forth. That trend is only going to increase.

SLD: Are the major core providers using these embedded cores as part of their subsystem IP?
Wawrzyniak: That could be. My point is that there is more activity than just the major IP providers. They are the largest players and thus the most well known, the most visible. That’s great. But they are never alone in a device. There are always other embedded cores in the same device doing different functions. That trend will increase.

In the long term, this means that the number of IP cores being used in devices will go way up. It is already going up. But it will go even farther, which again makes the argument for subsystem IP. Why deal with 200 separate IP blocks spread around the device instead of dealing with 10 equivalent subsystem blocks? In terms of functionality, there would be no difference. But from an expenditure of effort, there is a world of difference.

Originally posted on the System-Level Design portal.

John E. Blyler
Author, IP Insider blog
Editor-in-Chief, Chip Design magazine

Free counter and web stats

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Flexible Yogurt-Lid Electronics Become a Reality

Truly flexible electronics from processor, memory, interface, and battery components are here, thanks to Intel, IBM, STMicro, Leti, Imec, Kaist, Kovio, and others.

As leading-edge semiconductor companies race toward ever-smaller, atom-sized chips, it’s easy to overlook the amazing advances made in higher nodes – especially in plastic and organic electronics. This is good news for the chip design community, as the implementations of flexible and organic electronics will renew interest in existing semiconductor intellectual-property (IP) designs.

Earlier this year, Intel Labs, Plastic Logic and Queen’s University announced joint work to create a “paper” tablet computer. Developed at Queen’s University, the flexible tablet called “PaperTab” looks and feels like a sheet of paper. It is powered by a second generation Intel Core i5 processor. Unlike today’s tablets where several apps or windows can appear on the single display, the PaperTab would have one paper per applicatio but users could have several displays – like pages in a book.

 

For example, IBM recently demonstrated a thin-film-like flexible circuit that resembled a “yogurt lid.” This extremely flexible film, which is rooted in a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) -based plastic substrate, contained nearly 10,000 transistors. Adele Hars, Editor-in-Chief of Advanced Substrate News, described it as follows: “IBM has developed a new, low-cost technique that starts with the Full-Depleted (FD)-SOI technology developed with ST and Leti, for manufacturing silicon-based electronics on a flexible, plastic substrate. IBM’s Gary (Patton) showed a sample (at CPT 2013), and said that ‘research suggests that flexible, affordable electronics can be made with conventional processes at room temperature.’”

IBM’s flexible electronics and related semiconductor advances were part of my brief conversation with Sean O’Kane from Chipestimate.TV: Common Platform 2013 – Walk and Talk – Sean O’Kane and John Blyler (Part 1).

Of course, it will take more than just a processing circuit to create viable commercial products from flexible and organic materials. What about a memory system, interfaces, and power source? All of these other components are now available:

> Imec’s Organic Processors Offer Microwatt Applications

Printing low-power, low-performance microprocessors onto organic materials will open a wide range of cost-effective alternatives to traditional silicon wafers.

> Memory Challenges In The Extreme

Another example of an extremely low-power, low-performance memory application is in the emerging market of flexible, plastic electronics.  A team from the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) recently reported such a device [i.e., a fully functional, flexible, nonvolatile, resistive random-access memory (RRAM)].

> Kovio’s near-field communications (NFC) wireless tag is created using electronic inks and industrial graphics printing tools instead of more expensive ICs on silicon wafers.

> Stretchy Battery Drawn to Three Times its Size

Researchers have demonstrated a flat, “stretchy” battery that can be pulled to three times its size without a loss in performance.

As consumers, the age of flexible, “yogurt-lid” electronics may finally be here. With these advances, everything from our clothes to cereal boxes may serve as personal computers and communication systems.


Free counter and web stats

Posted in General | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Is Semiconductor IP Becoming the Universal Language?

The announcement of ChipEstimate.cn China in native language reinforces the strategic importance of IP in global chip designs.

Will IP become the universal language understood by all semiconductor chip-design engineers? The Esperanto of the technical world, so to speak?

One might argue that mathematics is already the universal language of all science and engineering. Interestingly, the famous mathematician, Gottfried Leibniz, also theorized about the possibility of a specifically constructed universal language. He called it the “characteristica universalism,” an “algebra” capable of expressing all conceptual thought. His goal was to build an alphabet of all human thought.

That goal is still evolving. In the meantime, we must avoid the nemesis of a universal language – namely, the “confusion of tongues” described in the Biblical story of the Tower of Babel. Today’s multi-national, multi-lingual, and multi-discipline engineers are well aware of the dangers of miscommunications in technical design content, system integration, and manufacturing.

But I digress. Will IP become a universal language? Maybe not. But the requirement for IP in today’s chip designs has made it the center of all engineering designs. Recognizing the important role that semiconductor IP plays in SoC design – as well as the globalization of engineering teams – Chipestimate.com has created several native-language IP portals. The latest is in China: http://www.chipestimate.cn/.

I’ve reported on the importance of Asian IP for several years - both the good and the bad (see below). Offering an IP portal in the native language of a nation with the fastest-growing number of engineers confirms that Chipestimate.com also recognizes this important trend.

Asian Semiconductor IP stories:

 

Posted in General | Leave a comment

Semiconductor Growth Turns Wireless

RF and mixed-signal intellectual-property (IP) technologies benefit from real growth, rumors of Apple’s WiFi chips, and MEMS.

The wireless chip market will be the leading growth segment for the semiconductor industry in 2013, predicts IHS iSuppli Semiconductor. The report states that original-equipment-manufacturer (OEM) spending on semiconductors for wireless applications will rise by 13.5% this year to reach a value of $69.6 billion – up from $62.3 billion in 2012.

Another sign of the dominance of wireless systems comes from Will Strauss, President & Principal Analyst of Forward Concepts.

“There is a rumor ‘published’ in Israel that Apple will be designing its own baseband and WiFi chips.  When Texas Instruments dropped out of the cellphone business, within a week about 100 of the former TI engineers in Israel were hired by Apple.

Another rumor is that Apple will employ Intel’s foundry service for its next-generation application processor production, distancing itself from dependence on Samsung.  Since the press is full of rumors of Apple using TSMC for their next apps processor, employing Intel’s fab is not a certainty.”

The design and development of wireless and cellular chips reflects a continuing need for related semiconductor IP. All wireless devices and cell phones rely on RF and analog mixed-signal (AMS) integrated circuits to convert radio signals into digital data, which can be passed to a baseband processor for data processing. That’s why a “wireless” search on the Chipestimate.com website reveals list after list of IP companies providing MIPI controllers, ADCs, DACs, PHY and MAC cores, LNAs, PAs, mixers, PLLs, VCOs, audio/video codecs, Viterbi encoders/decoders, and more.

Wireless has helped drive the growth of many industries – most notably, microelectromechanical-systems (MEMS) technology. The growth in RF MEMS could be considered “old news,” except that IP in sensors and signal-conditioning subsystems has been growing rapidly, thanks to smart phones, game interfaces, and tablet sales.

Wireless technology is the focus of several major upcoming conferences. In addition to this week’s Mobile World Conference, next week’s DVCon event has a session dedicated to Mixed-Signal/Power Aware Design and Verification.

There is no escaping the importance of wireless and AMS IP in today’s SoCs. Wireless chips will continue to lead semiconductor growth for many years to come.

Posted in General, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Video Highlights from Designcon 2013 with AWR, Agilent, and More

AWR’s Sherry Hess and Agilent’s Doru Popescu talk with IP Insider‘s John Blyler and Chipestimate.TV‘s Sean O’Kane at Designcon. We also show you a few behind-the-scenes pictures.

Here are video highlights from Designcon 2013:

John interviews Sherry Hess, VP with AWR – a National Instruments company – about software piracy.

Sean and John talk about what’s unique at DesignCon 2013, including Tek, Cast, SiSoft, and others.

Sean interviews Doru Popescu, Agilent Technologies, about technology and real vs. virtual trade shows.

 

What happens behind the scenes:

Lani Wong’s in the camera. How does she do that?

The Chipestimate.TV camera crew in action. Nice job, guys!



Free counter and web stats

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Robbing Engineers of their Innocence

The discussion continues on the need for more well-rounded engineers.

What follows is from an ongoing LinkedIn Semiconductor Group discussion concerning my quotes in IEEE-USA Today’s Engineer: Semiconductor Engineers Need Strong Technical and Emotional IQs.

I agree with Monaco that appreciating the depth of human behavior and with Francis that working outside of the business (one’s comfort zone) are key requirements for engineers to develop a healthy emotional IQ.

In my IEEE quote, I was thinking of emotion IQ in terms of social interaction with non-engineers and via today’s social media vehicles. But I’ve long believed that the more traditional issues to which you refer remain a skill-set absent in most engineers.

A very successful business friend and engineer of mine once recommended that engineers hold the sales bag at some point in their careers. What better way to appreciate the vagrancies of human nature than to work in sales – even for a short period of time?

One of my favorite authors, Samuel C. Florman, put it another way. He cautioned that the study of the liberal arts – a prerequisite for understanding human nature – will rob the engineer of his innocence. In turn, that loss would also make him less naïve about his fellow human beings (see below).

“… Today a student of the humanities is exposed to the feverish realities of life as well as to it’s exalted ideas.”

“The engineer already knows a lot about restraint and cooperation. He is a logical, sober, and well-meaning, a very good citizen. I submit that study of the liberal arts will rob him of his innocence, stain his character, make him less “moral” – or, at least, less naïve. And this is exactly what the engineer needs. In all of his thinking, henceforth, he will have to take into account the imperfections and the absurdities of his fellow human beings.”

“Then, subtle and worldly-wise, he will sally forth, rising through the Establishment to positions of power never held by him before. At the same time, the born leaders among our youth, seeing that engineers are no longer docile technicians, and recognizing that technology is the key to survival for civilization, will turn to engineering as a profession, away from law, politics and finance. Engineering will be “where the action is.” Engineers will become leaders, leaders will become engineers, and the world will have a better chance of avoiding disaster.” — Conscience, Error and Responsibility, pgs. 39-40, “The Existential Pleasures of Engineering,” by Samuel C. Florman

Engineering – where the action is! That’s what piqued my interest in the profession when I was younger. How about you?


Free counter and web stats

Posted in General | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment
 
      ChipEstimate.com Chip Planning & IP Portal -- Copyright © 2013 ChipEstimate.com. All rights reserved.
ChipEstimate.com Twitter feed  ChipEstimate.com Semiconductor IP on LinkedIn  ChipEstimate.com Semiconductor IP Channell on YouTube  ChipEstimate.com Semiconductor IP on Facebook


       Feedback  Privacy Policy  Terms of Use  Newsletter & Tech Talk Archive  IP Catalog Site Map